The Hamilton County Superior Court 4 Race: A Critical Look at Aaron Johnson

Hamilton County, Indiana — As we gear up for the 2026 election for Hamilton County Superior Court 4, the race is heating up. It's not just about the candidates; it’s also about the broader issues surrounding Indiana’s attorney discipline system and judicial accountability. A new law passed last year has reshuffled judicial positions, moving judges from several rural counties to meet the growing needs of Hamilton County. This change means Hamilton County will gain four new judicial officers: two magistrates and two superior court judges. And guess who’s stepping into the spotlight? Aaron Johnson, a graduate of Gary Indiana High School.

The current seat holder, Judge J. Richard Campbell, will be on the 2026 ballot as part of Indiana’s six-year judicial election cycle. Among the candidates is Magistrate Judge Aaron Johnson, whose campaign announcement has been featured in local media, including Current in Carmel.

At the same time, commentary from the Hoosier Enquirer has placed this race within a larger critique of Indiana’s legal disciplinary process. They point to illegal acts by Johnson that should have led to criminal charges. Given his history, he is far from the best candidate for the bench.

See this link for more details.

The Connection to Disciplinary Controversy

In a recent opinion piece titled “Gov. Braun or AG Rokita Must Act,” the Hoosier Enquirer argues that Indiana’s attorney discipline system lacks transparency and due process safeguards. They call on Governor Braun or AG Todd Rokita to take action.

The article recounts a disciplinary case and urges state officials to review systemic failures within prosecutorial and ethics enforcement bodies. The Hoosier Enquirer frames these issues as matters of public accountability, due process, constitutionality, and fundamental fairness. They conclude that Johnson, as Prosecutor, stepped on the bodies of good people he destroyed to climb the ladder. He even resorted to perjury and dirty tricks, including an illegal perjury trap, to advance his career. Voters and policymakers must scrutinize how disciplinary authority is exercised in Indiana. Johnson should not be advancing in the legal profession or on the bench in Hamilton County, where he is seen as a carpetbagger and a DEI appointment by his powerful puppet masters in the SCOIN.

Campaign Coverage and Public Perception

In announcing his candidacy, Johnson emphasized his experience as a newly "appointed" magistrate and his service within Indiana’s judicial system. However, many view his role as subservient and counterproductive to equal justice. He has been criticized as a DEI token and an attack dog, engaging in lawfare to pursue bogus legal ethics cases to climb the ranks. Doug Bernacchi, MBA/JD, a former Indiana lawyer now residing in Greenwich, CT, stated, "Aaron Johnson was the most dishonest and most unethical lawyer I ever met in 28 years of practicing law."

The superficial news coverage of his campaign has focused on his professional résumé as an eviction lawyer with the Indiana Housing Authority, a public defender, and a government lawyer. His stated priorities include judicial efficiency and public safety. However, the Hoosier Enquirer questions the broader implications of his past disciplinary actions and his lack of integrity. Evidence supports these claims, which have been ignored by the high court and the Disciplinary Commission, unrelated to the current election. Johnson must be stopped; he is far from "honorable."

Understanding Judicial Elections

Indiana's judicial elections are officially nonpartisan, although candidates often emerge from party primaries. Judges wield significant authority over criminal, civil, and family law matters. Therefore, judicial temperament, legal judgment, and respect for due process are central considerations for voters.

Election officials emphasize that voters should review multiple sources when evaluating judicial candidates. This includes official biographies, court records, public forums, and reputable news coverage. It's crucial to gather as much information as possible to make an informed decision.

Election Timeline

• Candidate filing period: January 7 – February 6, 2026.

THERE IS STILL TIME FOR MORE QUALIFIED CANDIDATES TO FILE TO FILL THIS OPEN BENCH.

• Primary election: May 5, 2026

• General election: November 3, 2026

  
  

As the filing deadline approaches, additional candidates and endorsements may emerge, further shaping the discussion around the Superior Court 4 race. So far, Attorneys Trampas Whalin and Angela Swenson are also running for Superior Court #4 in Hamilton County on May 6, 2026. Both are smarter, better educated, more independent, and far more honest than Johnson. One of them should easily defeat Johnson if the election isn't rigged for him again.

In conclusion, the stakes are high in this judicial race. It's not just about one candidate; it's about the integrity of our judicial system. We must demand accountability and transparency. Let’s ensure that we choose candidates who truly represent justice and fairness for all.