Hoosier Enquirer

Your Source for Indiana News

Indiana News

Breaking News

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.

Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.

top of page

WHAT THE...USA Today and 19 Newspapers Sue OpenAI Seeking More Than $250 Million, INCLUDING THE INDYSTAR?

1 hour ago
2 min read

State

Newspaper

City

Indiana

Indianapolis Star (IndyStar)

Indianapolis

Kentucky

The Courier Journal

Louisville

Ohio

The Cincinnati Enquirer

Cincinnati

Ohio

The Columbus Dispatch

Columbus

Michigan

Detroit Free Press

Detroit

Michigan

The Detroit News

Detroit


October 12, 2026 — The lawsuit is newly filed and remains in its preliminary stages.

USA Today Co., formerly Gannett, and 13 affiliated companies filed a federal copyright infringement lawsuit against OpenAI on October 8, 2026.


WHAT A FARCE AND FRIVOLOUS LAWSUIT. HOW MANY TIMES HAS USA TODAY AND ITS 19 NEWSPAPER PUBLISHED COMMENTS AND MATERIAL WITHOUT PERMISSION OF THE SOURCE OR TARGET?


HERE ARE LOCAL RAGS SEEKING TO GET A INJECTION OF CASH....ARE THEY FAILING?


State

Newspaper

City

Indiana

Indianapolis Star (IndyStar)

Indianapolis

Kentucky

The Courier Journal

Louisville

Ohio

The Cincinnati Enquirer

Cincinnati

Ohio

The Columbus Dispatch

Columbus

Michigan

Detroit Free Press

Detroit

Michigan

The Detroit News

Detroit


The lawsuit alleges that OpenAI used hundreds of thousands of copyrighted newspaper articles without authorization to train its artificial intelligence models, including ChatGPT. The publications involved include the Louisville Courier Journal, Indianapolis Star, Detroit Free Press and Milwaukee Journal Sentinel. Reuters


Federal Court Information

Item

Details

Case

USA Today Co., Inc. et al. v. OpenAI Foundation et al.

Case number

1:26-cv-08892

Court

U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York

Filing date

October 8, 2026

Plaintiffs

USA Today Co. and 13 affiliated companies

Defendants

Seven OpenAI entities

Damages sought

More than $250 million

Jury trial

Requested

Current status

Newly filed; no merits ruling verified

The publicly accessible docket shows that the plaintiffs also requested that the case be treated as related to existing consolidated litigation involving OpenAI and copyright infringement. Justia Dockets


What the Newspapers Allege


The publishers make three central arguments:

  1. Unauthorized copying: OpenAI allegedly incorporated copyrighted journalism into datasets used to train its models without permission or payment.

  2. Loss of readership and revenue: AI-generated summaries allegedly reduce the incentive for readers to visit newspaper websites, potentially affecting advertising and subscriptions.

  3. Removal of copyright information: The complaint alleges that certain data-processing methods stripped identifying information from copyrighted articles.

The publishers are seeking monetary damages and injunctive relief. They have also requested the destruction of certain models and datasets containing allegedly infringing material. These are allegations and requested remedies, not judicial findings. Subscription Insider


What Happens Next?


As of October 12, I could not verify a substantive court ruling or an answer filed by OpenAI. The publicly indexed docket I located was last retrieved October 8, so it may not reflect every subsequent filing.


OpenAI has argued in other copyright disputes that training AI systems on publicly available material can constitute fair use under federal copyright law. Whether that defense succeeds here remains unresolved.


For Hoosier Enquirer, there is an important Indiana angle: The Indianapolis Star is among the publications whose reporting is at issue. The complaint reportedly includes an example involving ChatGPT's summary of an Indianapolis Star investigation concerning an FBI raid. Subscription Insider


The case could have significant consequences for independent publishers, including Hoosier Enquirer, because it raises questions about compensation, attribution and the permissible use of copyrighted journalism by AI companies.



THIS CASE NEEDS TO BE SUMMARILY DISMISSED AND LEGAL FEES ASSESSED AGAINST THE PLAINTIFFS.

bottom of page