Hoosier Enquirer

Your Source for Indiana News

Indiana News

Breaking News

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.

Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.

top of page

HOW SHORT ARE THE SHORTS AT YOUR GYM? SHANE GILLIS, SNL AND THE RETURN OF MEN WHO REFUSE TO APOLOGIZE

38 minutes ago
5 min read

One comedian jokes about women's gym shorts, and America's outrage industry has another nervous breakdown. Perhaps it's time for men to start acting like men again.


By Hoosier Enquirer | October 12, 2026

INDIANAPOLIS — How short are the shorts at your gym? Apparently, short enough to create another national emergency among America's self-appointed guardians of acceptable male behavior.


Comedian Shane Gillis returned to Saturday Night Live on October 10 and committed what increasingly passes for a cultural offense in modern America: He made an outrageous joke about attractive women wearing revealing clothing at the gym, admitted that men sometimes look, and suggested that social media has turned the whole experience into a minefield.

Gillis described the brightly colored, tightly fitted shorts that have become common in fitness centers, then joked that men had better not look because someone might be recording them.

"I'm in the background of like 10 TikToks right now," he told the audience.


That was enough to ignite another celebrity outrage campaign. Actor Dan Levy denounced Gillis's remarks as misogynistic, comedian Phoebe Robinson attacked his comedy, and former SNL performer Ego Nwodim responded with a sarcastic gym photograph.


The controversy centered particularly on Gillis's use of a derogatory term for women wearing revealing workout clothes. Critics understandably objected to that language. But the larger joke about men being caught looking at attractive people in an age of ubiquitous smartphone cameras deserves a discussion that does not require another national moral tribunal.


Since when did noticing an attractive woman become a character defect?


There is an enormous difference between noticing someone, appreciating physical attractiveness, and harassing another person. Adults once understood that distinction without needing an Instagram lecture.


Dan Levy Comes to the Rescue


Levy, best known for Schitt's Creek, responded with a video declaring that women wearing short shorts should not be subjected to degrading labels. He also argued that men should do more to challenge language that objectifies women.


Fair enough. Women deserve respect regardless of what they wear.


But Levy went considerably further, connecting the normalization of objectifying language with the broader problem of sexual violence. Other commentators similarly linked Gillis's monologue to the national discussion surrounding sexual assault allegations at Cornell University.


That is where the cultural argument becomes troubling.


A comedian making a crude joke about gym clothing is not equivalent to a man committing sexual assault. The former is protected expression that audiences can criticize, laugh at or ignore. The latter is a serious crime.


Conflating the two does little to advance a serious discussion about either.

America needs men who understand boundaries, not men who are frightened of their own shadows.


What Happened to Men Being Men?


Somewhere along the way, American culture developed an extraordinary discomfort with traditional masculinity.


Confidence became suspect. Assertiveness required qualification. Male attraction became something to scrutinize. And a growing collection of cultural commentators appeared determined to redefine the ideal man as someone who never says anything offensive, never takes an unpopular position and never challenges the prevailing social consensus.


That is not progress. It is conformity dressed up as enlightenment.


The traditional virtues associated with masculinity—courage, independence, responsibility, strength, self-discipline and protecting others—remain as valuable today as they were generations ago.


Men should be encouraged to develop those qualities rather than apologize for them.

Being masculine does not require insulting women, intimidating strangers or treating every social interaction as a conquest. In fact, a confident man should have enough self-control to distinguish attraction from entitlement.


But neither does masculinity require perpetual deference to celebrities who believe their personal sensitivities should establish the boundaries of acceptable comedy.


A strong man can respect women, appreciate beauty, laugh at an outrageous joke and tell an offended celebrity to mind his own business.


Those things are not mutually exclusive.


The Gym Has Become a Social Media Studio


Gillis touched on another legitimate cultural complaint: the transformation of ordinary fitness centers into filming locations.


Walk into many modern gyms and the traditional equipment is competing with smartphones, tripods, elaborate workout outfits and people producing content for social media.

Some fitness influencers record legitimate instructional videos. Others document their progress. Still others appear more interested in building an audience than completing a workout.


None of those activities is inherently objectionable.


But when other gym members become unwilling background participants in someone's TikTok production, reasonable questions arise about privacy, consent and courtesy.

A person who accidentally appears in the background of a video should not automatically become the subject of public ridicule. Likewise, someone exercising should not have to tolerate persistent staring, intrusive recording or harassment.


The answer is straightforward: Respect everyone sharing the space.


Unfortunately, straightforward solutions rarely generate the attention that online outrage does.


Comedy Is Not Supposed to Require Permission


Gillis has already experienced the consequences of offending the entertainment establishment.


In 2019, Saturday Night Live dismissed him shortly after announcing his hiring because earlier podcast recordings contained offensive racial and anti-gay remarks.


Instead of disappearing, Gillis developed a successful independent comedy career, released stand-up specials, created the Netflix series Tires and eventually returned to host the very program that had dismissed him.


His October appearance was his third time hosting SNL. He was funny as hell. But the normal SNL audience can laugh they are too busy hating that they are losing the culture war.


That comeback illustrates something important about modern entertainment: Audiences do not always share the judgments of network executives or celebrity commentators.

People can reject an offensive remark without demanding that the person who made it disappear.


Comedy has always involved exaggeration, discomfort, embarrassment and observations that polite society might prefer to avoid.


Sometimes the joke succeeds. Sometimes it fails spectacularly.


Neither outcome requires a cultural emergency.


America Could Use More Backbone


The Hoosier Enquirer believes the country would benefit from renewed respect for the positive qualities traditionally associated with masculinity.


Young men should be encouraged to work hard, stay physically fit, accept responsibility, develop confidence, defend their principles and treat other people with dignity.


They should not be taught that masculinity itself is a problem requiring correction.


Nor should they confuse being strong with being cruel. Real confidence does not depend on humiliating women or weaker men.


The same principle applies to political disagreement. Progressive activists have every right to criticize Gillis, but critics of progressive cultural expectations have an equal right to ridicule the outrage.


Neither side is entitled to silence the other.


And perhaps the greatest sign of confidence is the ability to hear a joke, decide whether it is funny, and move on with your life.


How Short Are the Shorts at Your Gym?


So here is the question Gillis has placed before America: How short are the shorts at your gym, and why has discussing them become such a dangerous business?


Women are free to wear the workout clothing they choose, subject to ordinary gym rules. Men are free to notice attractive people. Everyone is responsible for behaving respectfully.

There is no constitutional crisis here, no need for another celebrity sermon and certainly no reason to treat every awkward interaction between men and women as evidence of a collapsing civilization.


What America needs is less performative outrage and more common sense.


It needs men who are comfortable being men, women who are comfortable being women, and a culture mature enough to recognize that attraction is normal, harassment is unacceptable, and comedy is not legislation.


When real funny men like Shane Gillis tell a crude joke, the liberal outrage industry responds as though civilization is ending.


Perhaps the real joke is how predictable the reaction has become.


Men, keep your backbone. Keep your sense of humor. Respect women, avoid AI Bots in short shorts or nigerian scammers. And for heaven's sake, stop asking the internet for permission to be yourselves.

bottom of page