.png)
Indianapolis, IN – A legal controversy has emerged in Center Township as Judge Gary Miller has been tasked with initiating proceedings related to a complaint aimed at removing Constable Kenneth Allen from office. The complaint stems from allegations that Allen does not reside within the boundaries of Center Township, a requirement mandated by Indiana law for individuals holding the position of constable.
Under Indiana Code Title 3. Elections § 3-8-2-7, candidates for township offices, including constable, must be residents of the township they seek to serve at the time of their candidacy and throughout their term. However, evidence has surfaced suggesting that Kenneth Allen knowingly ran for the office of Center Township Constable despite living outside the township, raising questions about his eligibility and compliance with state election laws.
Residency Discrepancies Uncovered
The issue came to light following an investigation by local media outlets, including Fox 59 and the Hoosier Enquirer, which revealed inconsistencies in Allen’s claimed residency. According to an exclusive report by the Hoosier Enquirer, a copy of Kenneth Allen’s marriage certificate lists his address as 28 East 16th Street, Indianapolis, IN 46202, the location of the Piccadilly Apartments. However, the apartment manager at Piccadilly confirmed to the public that Allen did not move into the complex until December 2024, well after his candidacy and election.
Further complicating the matter, the marriage certificate also ties Allen to his new wife, Rebecca Kristine Hargrove , who resides at 8314 Christiana Lane, Indianapolis, IN 46256, an address located outside of Center Township. Fox 59 confirmed that Allen moved in December, and the Piccadilly Apartments management told Hoosier Enquirer that Allen used his wife’s Christiana Lane address when applying for his apartment. These findings suggest that Allen may not have maintained a residence within Center Township at the time he ran for office, as required by law.
Legal and Political Implications
The assignment of Judge Gary Miller to this case marks the beginning of a formal process to adjudicate the complaint against Allen. If the allegations are substantiated, Allen could face removal from his position as Center Township Constable, a role responsible for serving court documents, executing warrants, and performing other law enforcement duties within the township.
Indiana law is clear on residency requirements for township officials, and violations can lead to disqualification or removal from office. The complaint against Allen hinges on whether he knowingly misrepresented his residency during his campaign and whether he has since failed to establish a legitimate residence within Center Township.
Public and Media Reaction
The revelations have sparked outrage among some Center Township residents and officials, who argue that Allen’s actions undermine the integrity of the electoral process. The involvement of reputable news outlets like Fox 59 and the Hoosier Enquirer has amplified the story, bringing public scrutiny to Allen’s conduct and the enforcement of election laws in Indiana.
Allen has not yet publicly responded to the allegations or the complaint, leaving many questions unanswered about his intentions and his current living situation. Meanwhile, the Piccadilly Apartments management’s confirmation of his December 2024 move-in date and the use of his wife’s address outside the township have fueled speculation about his compliance with state law.
Next Steps
As Judge Miller begins the process of reviewing the complaint, all eyes will be on the evidence presented and the legal arguments that unfold. The outcome of this case could set a precedent for how residency requirements are enforced for township officials across Indiana. If Allen is found to have violated Indiana Code Title 3. Elections § 3-8-2-7 , it may prompt further review of candidacy qualifications and strengthen accountability measures in local elections.
For now, Center Township awaits a resolution, as Judge Miller’s proceedings will determine whether Kenneth Allen can continue to serve as constable or if his tenure will be cut short by this residency controversy. The case serves as a stark reminder of the importance of transparency and adherence to legal standards in public office.